![]() ![]() That’s ironic, considering Rowling herself wrote the screenplays for the Fantastic Beasts films-something she never did for the Harry Potter adaptations. Rowling and the curse of the prequel series Fantastic Beasts has tried to capitalize on that massive built-in fan base, but the movies neglect the original franchise’s most spellbinding features: substantial storytelling with heaps of enduring charm. The series, across three installments, has never understood the audience it was trying to serve-the millions of readers and viewers who helped make Harry Potter the best-selling book series in history, turn the films’ young cast into household names, and conjure a market for a successful Broadway play. Yet the biggest reason for Fantastic Beasts’ decline is not the pandemic or the tarnished public image of the talent involved. Rowling’s polarizing comments about the trans community, multiple cast members’ scandals, and the pandemic’s impact on the viability of theatrical releases-all of which likely contributed to an awkward press tour and rumors about an early end to a planned five-film arc. Off-screen, the franchise has been plagued with trouble, including the author J. Over the weekend, Secrets, which reportedly cost $200 million to make, drew $43 million at the domestic box office, the softest opening ever for a release from the Wizarding World. The Fantastic Beasts films, a prequel series that once seemed like a foolproof moneymaker to extend the Harry Potter franchise, have become an expensive exercise in diminishing returns instead. Or maybe, given how the clash arrived around the two-hour mark, they were simply too exhausted by the film to process what the moment meant. Maybe they found the look of the action-all CGI whizbangs against a colorless backdrop-silly. Maybe they were thrown off by the rushed lead-up to the scene, which had, a beat earlier, involved an election for the next leader of a magical society. But when the two began firing flashy spells from their wands, the audience at my showing-nowhere near sold out, on a Saturday evening-laughed. Albus Dumbledore, the mighty wizard played by Jude Law, comes face-to-face with his former lover turned nemesis, Gellert Grindelwald (Mads Mikkelsen), breaking the pact they’d made as young men never to fight each other. ![]() The final showdown in Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore is supposed to be epic. The whole "we meet at Hogwarts to make a plan to save the world"-scene could have been replaced by a simple letter and wasn't any more than an excuse to include the castle in the trailer.This article contains spoilers for Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore. They get shot down like puppets in a 15:1 strength ratio, are knocked out by Quidditch balls that wouldn't even cause a twelve-year-old any problems (see Harry Potter Part 2) and get beaten up by a Muggle with a suitcase. Plus the faceless army of Grindelwald's followers is so utterly incompetent that there never is any real danger to the heroes. This only prevents the main story from progressing and (apart from the admittedly hilarious sidekick Kowalski) creates passages that you just have to endure. Instead of focusing on Newt, Dumbledore or Grindelwald the writers included screentime filling action for a number of side characters that does not influence the outcome at all. ![]() Overall the movie ended up being a visually impressive gathering of missed opportunities. A movie with some solid ideas for character development and a promising overall plotline that constantly loses itself in meaningless subplots and ridicoulus moments of mere fan service. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |